Obama and the corruption of big oil The US president's approach to environmentalism has disappointed his early supporters

Barack Obama once promised to "end the tyranny of oil" but as president he has been cozy with the industry [EPA]

For connoisseurs, Barack Obama's fundraising emails for the 2012
election campaign seem just a tad forlorn - slightly limp reminders of
the last time round.

Four years ago at this time, the early
adopters among us were just starting to get used to the regular flow of
email from the Obama campaign. The missives were actually exciting to
get, because they seemed less like appeals for money than a chance to
join a movement.

Sometimes they came with inspirational videos
from Camp Obama, especially the volunteer training sessions staged by
organising guru Marshall Ganz. Here's a favourite of mine, where a woman
invokes Bobby Kennedy and Cesar Chavez and says that, as the weekend
went on, she "felt her heart softening", her cynicism "melting," her
determination building. I remember that feeling, and I remember clicking
time and again to send another $50 off to fund that people-powered
mission. (And I recall knocking on a lot of New Hampshire doors, too,
with my 14-year-old daughter.)

It's no wonder, then, that I'm
still on the email list. But I haven't been clicking through this time.
Not even when Barack Obama himself asked me to "donate $75 or more today
to be automatically entered for a chance to join me for dinner." Not
even when campaign manager Jim Messina pointed out that, though "the
president has very little time to spend on anything related to the
campaign … this is how he chooses to spend it - having real, substantive
conversations with people like you" over the dinner you might just win.
(And if you do win, you'll be put on a plane to "Washington, or
Chicago, or wherever he might be that day".)

Not even when deputy
campaign manager Jen O'Malley Dillon offered to let me "take ownership
of this campaign" by donating to it and, as an "added bonus," possibly
finding myself "across the table from the president". Not even when
Michelle lowered the entry price from $75 to $25 and offered this bit of
remindurance: "Just relax. Barack wants this dinner to be fun, and he
really loves getting to know supporters like you." Not even when, hours
before an end-of-September fundraising "deadline," Barack himself
dropped the asking price to three dollars. God, have a little
self-respect man! Three dollars?

Broken promises

Here's the thing I'm starting
to think Obama never understood: For most of us the 2008 campaign was
partly about him, but it was more about the campaign itself - about the
sudden feeling of power that gripped a web-enabled populace, who felt
themselves able to really, truly hope. Hope that maybe they'd found a
candidate who would escape the tried-and-true money corruption of
Washington.

None of us gave $50 hoping for a favour. Quite the
opposite. You gave $50 hoping that, for the first time in a long while
in American politics, no one would get a favour. And the candidate, it
must be said, led us on. His rhetorical flights were dazzling - to
environmentalists like me, he promised to "free this nation from the
tyranny of oil once and for all", and pledged that his administration
would mark the moment when "the rise of the oceans began to slow and our
planet began to heal".

Once in office, it was inevitable that
he'd disappoint us to some degree. In fact, we knew the disappointment
would come and braced ourselves for it. After all, our movement was up
against the staggering power of vested corporate and financial
interests. It's hard to beat big money. Still, we didn't mind thinking:
Yes, we can. We'll work hard. We've got your back. Let's go!

What
we completely missed was that Obama didn't want us at his back - that
the minute the campaign was over he would cut us adrift, jettison the
movement that had brought him to power. Instead of using all those
millions of people to force through ambitious health-care proposals or
serious climate legislation or (fill in the blank yourself here), he
governed as the opposite of a movement candidate.

He clearly had
not the slightest interest in keeping that network activated and
engaged. Though we had brought him to the party, it was as if he didn't
really want to dance with us. Instead - however painful the image may be
- he wanted to dance with Larry Summers. (Fundraising idea: I'd pay $75
to be mindured I never had to have dinner with Summers.)

As the
months of his administration rolled into years, he only seemed to grow
less interested in movements of any sort. Before long, people like Tom
Donahue, president and CEO of the US Chamber of Commerce, were topping
the list of the most frequent visitors to the White House. And that was
before this winter when - after they'd been the biggest contributors to
GOP congressional candidates - Obama went on bended knee to Chamber
headquarters, apologising that he hadn't brought a fruitcake along as a
gift. (What is it with this guy and food? At any rate, he soon gave
them a far better present, hiring former Chamber insider Bill Daley as
his chief of staff.)

New strategies

Now, with his popularity
tanking, Obama and his advisors talk about "tacking left" for the
election. A nice thought, but maybe just a little late.

Increasingly, it seems to me, those of us who were ready to move with
him four years ago are deciding to leave normal channels and find new
forms of action. Here's an example: by year's end the president has said
he will make a decision on the Keystone XL pipeline, which would carry
crude oil from the tar sands of northern Alberta to the Gulf of Mexico.
The nation's top climate scientists sent the administration a letter
indicating that such a development would be disastrous for the climate.

NASA's James Hansen, the government's top climate researcher, said
heavily tapping tar-sands oil, a particularly "dirty" form of fossil
fuel, would mean "game over for the climate". Ten of the president's
fellow recent Nobel Peace Prize laureates pointed out in a letter that
blocking the prospective pipeline would offer him a real leadership
moment, a "tremendous opportunity to begin transiton away from our
dependence on oil, coal, and gas."

But every indication from this
administration suggests that it is prepared to grant the necessary
permission for a project that has the enthusiastic backing of the
Chamber of Commerce, and in which the Koch Brothers - who help finance
the Tea Party movement - have a "direct and substantial interest". And
not just backing. To use the words of a recent New York Times
story, they are willing to "flout the intent of federal law" to get it
done. Check this out as well: the State Department, at the
recommendation of Keystone XL pipeline builder TransCanada, hired a
second company to carry out the environmental review. That company
already considered itself a "major client" of TransCanada. This is
simply corrupt, potentially the biggest scandal of the Obama years. And
here's the thing: it's a crime still in progress. Watching the president
do nothing to stop it is endlessly depressing.

For many of us,
it has been an overdue wake-up call, a sharp reminder of just who the
president was really listening to. In mid-summer, several leaders of the
environmental movement, myself included, put out a call for nonviolent
civil disobedience at the White House over the upcoming Keystone
pipeline decision. And more people - 1,253 in total - showed up to be
arrested than at anytime in the last 40 years. (One reason Obama's
emails stink this time around: the guy who used to write many of them,
Elijah Zarlin, not only isn't working for the campaign any more, but got
hauled off in a paddy wagon.)

Bare months have past and already
that arrest record is being threatened, thank heavens, by the forces of
#OccupyWallStreet, a movement that includes plenty more of the kind of
people who rallied so enthusiastically behind Obama back in 2008.

Obama
had mojo when he knew it wasn't about him, that it was about change.
But when you promise change, you have to deliver. His last best
opportunity may come with that Keystone Pipeline decision, which he can
make entirely by himself, without our inane Congress being able to get
in the way. So on November 6th, exactly one year before the election,
we're planning to circle the White House with people. And the signs
we'll be carrying will simply be quotes from his last campaign - all
that stuff about the tyranny of big oil and the healing of the planet.

Our
message will be simple: If you didn't mean it, you shouldn't have said
it. If you did, here's the chance to prove it. Nix the pipeline.

We don't want dinner. We want action

» Israel lobby empowers Palestinian solidarity The ADL report targets pro-Palestinian student groups and warns college presidents they could lose funding for protests
» A close look at the advisers whom Obama has chosen to save and sack reveal his true political personality.
» الكتاب: A Brief Summary of The Early Muslim Generation Belief - الوجيز فى منهج السلف الصالح
» الكتاب: Treasures in the Sunnah a Scintific Approach - Part I - الاعجاز العلمي في السنة
» الكتاب: Treasures in the Sunnah a Scintific Approach - Part II - الاعجاز العلمي في السنة